Introduction to Agents and Agent Architectures: Building Autonomous AI Systems

Introduction to Agents and Agent Architectures

The landscape of artificial intelligence is undergoing a fundamental transformation. For years, AI systems excelled at passive, discrete tasks such as answering questions, translating text, or generating images from prompts. This paradigm, while powerful, required constant human direction for every step. We are now witnessing a paradigm shift—from AI that merely predicts or creates content to a new class of software capable of autonomous problem-solving and task execution.

This revolution centers on AI agents, a complete application that combines a Language Model's ability to reason with the practical capacity to act. Unlike static workflows, agents can work autonomously, figuring out next steps needed to reach goals without constant human guidance at every turn. Agents are not simply AI models; they are intelligent systems designed to plan, act, and observe their environment to accomplish defined objectives.

For developers, architects, and product leaders, this shift demands a new understanding of how to build, deploy, and manage these autonomous systems at production scale. While prototyping a simple agent is relatively straightforward, ensuring security, quality, and reliability presents significant challenges. This comprehensive guide provides the foundational concepts and architectural frameworks necessary to transition from proof-of-concept demonstrations to robust, production-grade agentic systems.

From Predictive AI to Autonomous Agents

The evolution from traditional machine learning to autonomous agents represents a significant leap in AI capability and utility. Traditional AI systems operated within well-defined boundaries—you asked them a question, and they provided an answer. Conversely, agents operate in a fundamentally different manner: they receive a high-level goal, decompose it into actionable steps, and execute those steps with minimal intervention.

This shift enables entirely new classes of applications. Consider a customer support scenario: a traditional chatbot would require explicit instructions for every possible situation. An autonomous agent, however, can understand a customer's problem, retrieve relevant information from multiple sources, make decisions about the best course of action, and even take concrete steps—such as issuing refunds or scheduling appointments—all without human intervention.

The critical capability that distinguishes agents from traditional AI is their autonomy. Agents are goal-oriented systems that combine reasoning, planning, and execution into a cohesive whole. They represent the natural evolution of language models, made genuinely useful in real-world software applications.

Understanding AI Agents: Definition and Core Components

An AI agent can be defined as the combination of models, tools, an orchestration layer, and runtime services that uses a language model in a loop to accomplish a goal. These four essential elements form the foundation of any autonomous system:

The Model (The "Brain"): The core language model (LM) or foundation model that serves as the agent's central reasoning engine. This component processes information, evaluates options, and makes decisions. The type of model selected—whether general-purpose, fine-tuned, or multimodal—dictates the agent's cognitive capabilities. An agentic system essentially becomes the curator of the language model's input context window, determining what information reaches the model at each step.

Tools (The "Hands"): These mechanisms connect the agent's reasoning to the outside world, enabling actions beyond text generation. Tools include API extensions, code functions, and data stores like databases or vector stores for accessing real-time, factual information. An agentic system allows the language model to plan which tools to use, executes the tool, and feeds the results back into the input context window for the next language model call.

The Orchestration Layer (The "Nervous System"): The governing process that manages the agent's operational loop, handling planning, memory (state), and reasoning strategy execution. This layer uses prompting frameworks and reasoning techniques such as Chain-of-Thought or ReAct to break down complex goals into manageable steps and determine when to think versus when to use a tool.

Deployment (The "Body and Legs"): While building an agent on a laptop is effective for prototyping, production deployment transforms it into a reliable and accessible service. This involves hosting the agent on secure, scalable servers and integrating it with essential production services for monitoring, logging, and management.

The Agentic Problem-Solving Process

Understanding how agents actually operate requires examining their core operational cycle. Agents function through a continuous, cyclical process to achieve their objectives. While this loop can become highly complex, it can be broken down into five fundamental steps:

Step 1: Get the Mission

The process initiates with a specific, high-level goal provided either by a user (e.g., "Organize my team's travel for the upcoming conference") or an automated trigger (e.g., "A new high-priority customer ticket has arrived").

Step 2: Scan the Scene

The agent perceives its environment to gather context. The orchestration layer accesses available resources, determining what information the agent can access. This includes understanding the user's request, reviewing any existing memory or previous interactions, and assessing what information is available from tools, calendars, databases, or APIs.

Step 3: Think It Through

This represents the agent's core "think" loop, driven by the reasoning model. The agent analyzes the mission against the current scene and devises a comprehensive plan. This is often a chain of reasoning: "To book travel, I first need to know who is on the team. I'll use the get_team_roster tool. Then I'll check their availability via the calendar_api."

Step 4: Take Action

The orchestration layer executes the first concrete step of the plan by selecting and invoking the appropriate tool. This might involve calling an API, running a code function, or querying a database. This is where the agent acts on the world beyond its own internal reasoning.

Step 5: Observe and Iterate

The agent observes the outcome of its action. If the get_team_roster tool returns a list of five names, this new information is added to the agent's context or memory. The loop then repeats, returning to Step 3: "Now that I have the roster, my next step is to check the calendar for these five people. I'll use the calendar_api."

This "Think, Act, Observe" cycle continues—managed by the Orchestration Layer, reasoned by the Model, and executed by the Tools—until the agent's internal plan is complete and the mission is achieved.

Real-World Example: Customer Support Agent

Consider a user asking, "Where is my order #12345?" A sophisticated customer support agent would execute the following process:

Instead of immediately acting, the agent enters its "Think It Through" phase to devise a complete strategy: "The user wants a delivery status. To provide a complete answer, I need a multi-step plan: (1) Identify—I must first find the order in our internal database to confirm it exists and get its details; (2) Track—From those details, I'll extract the shipping carrier's tracking number and query the external carrier's API for live status; (3) Report—Finally, I must synthesize the information I've gathered into a clear, helpful response for the user."

With this multi-step plan in mind, the agent begins execution. In its first "Act" phase, it executes step one by calling the find_order("12345") tool. It observes the result—a full order record, including tracking number "ZYX987."

The agent's orchestration layer recognizes that the first part of its plan is complete and immediately proceeds to the second. It acts by calling the get_shipping_status("ZYX987") tool. It observes the new result: "Out for Delivery."

Finally, having successfully executed the data-gathering stages of its plan, the agent moves to the "Report" step. It recognizes it has all necessary components and generates the response: "Your order #12345 is 'Out for Delivery'!"

A Taxonomy of Agentic Systems

A key architectural decision involves understanding what kind of agent to build. Agentic systems can be classified into five broad levels, each building upon the capabilities of the last:

Level 0: The Core Reasoning System

At the most basic level, we have the reasoning engine itself: a Language Model operating in isolation, responding solely based on pre-trained knowledge without tools, memory, or interaction with the live environment. Its strength lies in its extensive training, allowing explanation of established concepts and strategic planning. The critical trade-off is complete lack of real-time awareness—the system is functionally "blind" to any event or fact outside its training data. It can explain baseball history but cannot answer "What was the final score of the Yankees game last night?" because that game occurred after the training data was collected.

Level 1: The Connected Problem-Solver

At this level, the reasoning engine becomes a functional agent by connecting to external tools. Its problem-solving is no longer confined to static, pre-trained knowledge. Using the five-step loop, the agent can now answer real-time questions by invoking tools like search APIs. This fundamental ability to interact with the world—using search tools for scores, financial APIs for stock prices, or databases via Retrieval-Augmented Generation—is the core capability of a Level 1 agent.

Level 2: The Strategic Problem-Solver

Level 2 marks significant expansion, moving from executing simple tasks to strategically planning complex, multi-part goals. The key skill that emerges is context engineering: the agent's ability to actively select, package, and manage the most relevant information for each step of its plan. An agent's accuracy depends on focused, high-quality context.

For example, when tasked with finding a good coffee shop halfway between two addresses, a Level 2 agent would (1) calculate the midpoint location, (2) search for coffee shops in that area with high ratings (automatically refining search parameters based on the user's criteria for "good"), and (3) synthesize results and present them to the user. This strategic planning also enables proactive assistance.

Level 3: The Collaborative Multi-Agent System

At the highest level, the paradigm shifts entirely. Instead of building a single, all-powerful "super-agent," organizations develop a "team of specialists" working in concert, directly mirroring human organizations. The system's collective strength lies in this division of labor.

Here, agents treat other agents as tools. A "Project Manager" agent receiving the mission "Launch our new 'Solaris' headphones" would not do the entire work itself but would delegate to specialized agents:

1. MarketResearchAgent: "Analyze competitor pricing for noise-canceling headphones. Return a summary document by tomorrow."
2. MarketingAgent: "Draft three versions of a press release using the 'Solaris' product spec sheet as context."
3. WebDevAgent: "Generate the new product page HTML based on the attached design mockups."

This collaborative model represents the frontier of automating entire, complex business workflows from start to finish.

Level 4: The Self-Evolving System

Level 4 represents a profound leap from delegation to autonomous creation and adaptation. An agentic system can identify gaps in its own capabilities and dynamically create new tools or even new agents to fill them. It moves from using a fixed set of resources to actively expanding them.

The Project Manager agent, realizing it needs to monitor social media sentiment, might invoke an AgentCreator tool with a new mission: "Build a new agent that monitors social media for keywords 'Solaris headphones', performs sentiment analysis, and reports a daily summary." A new SentimentAnalysisAgent would be created, tested, and added to the team on the fly, ready to contribute to the original mission.

Core Agent Architecture: Building the Foundation

Moving from concept to code requires understanding the specific architectural design of three core components: the model, tools, and orchestration layer.

Model Selection: The Brain of Your Agent

The language model is the reasoning core of your agent, and its selection is a critical architectural decision. However, treating this choice as simply picking the model with the highest benchmark score is a path to failure. Real-world success demands a model that excels at agentic fundamentals: superior reasoning to navigate complex, multi-step problems and reliable tool use to interact with the world.

Start by defining the business problem, then test models against metrics that directly map to that outcome. If your agent needs to write code, test it on your private codebase. If it processes insurance claims, evaluate its ability to extract information from your specific document formats.

You may choose more than one model, creating a "team of specialists." A robust agent architecture might use a frontier model like Gemini 2.5 Pro for heavy lifting and complex reasoning, then intelligently route simpler, high-volume tasks to a faster, more cost-effective model like Gemini 2.5 Flash. This model routing—whether automatic or hard-coded—is a key strategy for optimizing both performance and cost.

The same principle applies to handling diverse data types. While a natively multimodal model offers a streamlined path to processing images and audio, an alternative is using specialized tools like Cloud Vision API or Speech-to-Text API. The world is first converted to text, which is then passed to a language-only model for reasoning. This adds flexibility and allows for best-of-breed components but introduces significant complexity.

Tools: Connecting Reasoning to Reality

If the model is the agent's brain, tools are the hands that connect its reasoning to reality. A robust tool interface consists of three parts: defining what a tool can do, invoking it, and observing the result.

Retrieval Tools: The most foundational tool is the ability to access up-to-date information. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) gives the agent a "library card" to query external knowledge, often stored in Vector Databases or Knowledge Graphs. For structured data, Natural Language to SQL tools allow the agent to query databases to answer analytical questions. By looking things up before speaking, the agent grounds itself in fact, dramatically reducing hallucinations.

Execution Tools: The true power of agents is unleashed when they move from reading information to actively doing things. By wrapping existing APIs and code functions as tools, an agent can send emails, schedule meetings, or update customer records. For more dynamic tasks, an agent can write and execute code on the fly in a secure sandbox, generating SQL queries or Python scripts to solve complex problems.

Interaction Tools: Agents can use Human-in-the-Loop tools to pause their workflow and ask for confirmation or request specific information from a user interface, ensuring people are involved in critical decisions.

The Orchestration Layer: Connecting Brain and Hands

If the model is the agent's brain and tools are its hands, the orchestration layer is the central nervous system. It runs the "Think, Act, Observe" loop, manages the state machine governing agent behavior, and brings a developer's carefully crafted logic to life.

Design Patterns and Multi-Agent Systems

As tasks grow in complexity, building a single super-agent becomes inefficient. The more effective solution adopts a "team of specialists" approach, mirroring human organizations. A complex process is segmented into discrete sub-tasks, each assigned to a dedicated, specialized AI agent.

The Coordinator Pattern

For dynamic or non-linear tasks, the Coordinator pattern is essential. A "manager" agent analyzes a complex request, segments the primary task, and intelligently routes each sub-task to the appropriate specialist agent (researcher, writer, coder). The coordinator then aggregates responses from each specialist to formulate a final, comprehensive answer.

The Sequential Pattern

For more linear workflows, the Sequential pattern acts like a digital assembly line where the output from one agent becomes the direct input for the next.

The Iterative Refinement Pattern

This pattern creates a feedback loop, using a "generator" agent to create content and a "critic" agent to evaluate it against quality standards. For high-stakes tasks, the Human-in-the-Loop pattern creates a deliberate pause to get approval before significant actions.

Agent Deployment and Production Services

After building a local agent, deploying it to a server where it runs continuously and other people and agents can use it transforms it from a tool into a service. Deployment and services represent the "body and legs" of an agent.

An agent requires several services to be effective: session history persistence, memory management, security infrastructure, and logging systems. As an agent builder, you must also decide what to log and what security measures to take for data privacy and regulatory compliance.

Agent builders can rely on purpose-built, agent-specific deployment options like Vertex AI Agent Engine, which support runtime and everything else in one platform. For developers who want more direct control, any agent can be added to a Docker container and deployed onto industry-standard runtimes like Cloud Run or Google Kubernetes Engine.

For those not experienced with software deployment, many agent frameworks make this easy with a deploy command or dedicated platform. Ramping up to a secure, production-ready environment usually requires investment in best practices, including CI/CD and automated testing.

Agent Ops: Managing Unpredictability

The transition from traditional, deterministic software to stochastic, agentic systems requires a new operational philosophy. Traditional software unit tests could assert output == expected, but this doesn't work when an agent's response is probabilistic by design. Language is complicated and usually requires a language model to evaluate quality—determining that the agent's response accomplishes what it should, avoids what it shouldn't, and maintains proper tone.

Agent Ops is the disciplined, structured approach to managing this reality. It is a natural evolution of DevOps and MLOps, tailored for the unique challenges of building, deploying, and governing AI agents.

Measuring What Matters

Before improving an agent, you must define what "better" means in your business context. Frame your observability strategy like an A/B test and ask: what Key Performance Indicators prove the agent delivers value? These metrics should go beyond technical correctness to measure real-world impact: goal completion rates, user satisfaction scores, task latency, operational cost per interaction, and impact on business goals like revenue or customer retention.

Quality Over Pass/Fail

Since simple pass/fail is impossible, shift to evaluating quality using an "LM as Judge." This involves using a powerful model to assess the agent's output against a predefined rubric: Did it give the right answer? Was the response factually grounded? Did it follow instructions? This automated evaluation, run against a golden dataset of prompts, provides a consistent measure of quality.

Metrics-Driven Development

Once you establish trusted quality scores, you can confidently test changes. The process is simple: run the new version against the entire evaluation dataset and directly compare its scores to the existing production version. This robust system eliminates guesswork, ensuring confidence in every deployment.

Debugging with Traces

When metrics dip or a user reports a bug, you need to understand "why." An OpenTelemetry trace is a high-fidelity, step-by-step recording of the agent's entire execution path, allowing you to see the exact prompt sent to the model, the model's internal reasoning, the specific tool chosen, precise parameters generated, and the raw data that came back as an observation. Traces provide the details needed to diagnose and fix root causes of any issue.

Securing Agents: Managing the Trust Trade-Off

When creating an AI agent, you immediately face a fundamental tension: the trade-off between utility and security. To make an agent useful, you must give it power—autonomy to make decisions and tools to perform actions like sending emails or querying databases. However, every ounce of power granted introduces corresponding risk.

Primary security concerns include rogue actions—unintended or harmful behaviors—and sensitive data disclosure. You want to give your agent a leash long enough to do its job but short enough to prevent running into traffic, especially when that traffic involves irreversible actions or private company data.

Defense in Depth Approach

You cannot rely solely on the AI model's judgment, as it can be manipulated through prompt injection. Instead, employ a hybrid, defense-in-depth approach.

The first layer consists of traditional, deterministic guardrails—hardcoded rules that act as a security chokepoint outside the model's reasoning. This could be a policy engine that blocks any purchase over a specified amount or requires explicit user confirmation before the agent interacts with an external API. This layer provides predictable, auditable hard limits on the agent's power.

The second layer leverages reasoning-based defenses, using AI to secure AI. This involves training the model to be more resilient to attacks and employing smaller, specialized "guard models" that examine the agent's proposed plan before execution, flagging potentially risky or policy-violating steps for review. This hybrid model combines the rigid certainty of code with the contextual awareness of AI, creating a robust security posture.

Agent Identity and Access Control

An agent is not merely a piece of code; it is an autonomous actor requiring its own verifiable identity. Each agent must be issued a secure, verifiable "digital passport"—an Agent Identity distinct from the identity of the user who invoked it and the developer who built it. This is a fundamental shift in how we approach Identity and Access Management in the enterprise.

Once an agent has a cryptographically verifiable identity (often using standards like SPIFFE), it can be granted specific, least-privilege permissions. The SalesAgent is granted read/write access to the CRM, while the HR-onboarding Agent is explicitly denied. This granular control is critical for ensuring that even if a single agent is compromised, the potential blast radius is contained.

Scaling to Enterprise Fleets

When scaling from a single agent to an enterprise fleet, organizations must manage complex networks of interactions, data flows, and potential security vulnerabilities. This requires a higher-order governance layer integrating all identities and policies into a central control plane.

An effective approach uses a central gateway serving as a control plane for all agentic activity, establishing a mandatory entry point for all traffic including user-to-agent prompts, agent-to-tool calls, agent-to-agent collaborations, and direct inference requests. This control plane serves two primary functions: runtime policy enforcement (authentication and authorization) and centralized governance through a central registry—an enterprise app store for agents and tools.

Advanced Agents: Real-World Examples

Understanding how advanced agents function in practice provides valuable insights into the frontier of autonomous AI systems.

Google Co-Scientist

Co-Scientist is an advanced AI agent designed to function as a virtual research collaborator, accelerating scientific discovery. It enables researchers to define a goal and generate and evaluate a landscape of novel hypotheses. To achieve this, Co-Scientist spawns an ecosystem of agents collaborating with each other.

The system functions as a research project manager. The AI takes a broad research goal and creates a detailed project plan. A "Supervisor" agent acts as the manager, delegating tasks to specialized agents and distributing resources like computing power. This structure ensures the project scales easily and improves methods as work progresses toward the final goal.

AlphaEvolve Agent

AlphaEvolve is an AI agent that discovers and optimizes algorithms for complex problems in mathematics and computer science. It works by combining creative code generation with an automated evaluation system, using an evolutionary process: the AI generates potential solutions, an evaluator scores them, and the most promising ideas become inspiration for the next generation of code.

This approach has led to significant breakthroughs, including improving efficiency of data centers and chip design, discovering faster matrix multiplication algorithms, and finding new solutions to open mathematical problems. AlphaEvolve excels at problems where verifying solution quality is far easier than finding it.

Agent Evolution and Learning

Agents deployed in real-world environments operate in dynamic settings where policies, technologies, and data formats constantly change. Without adaptation ability, agent performance degrades over time—a process called "aging"—leading to loss of utility and trust.

Agents can learn from experience through runtime artifacts such as session logs, traces, and memory, which capture successes, failures, tool interactions, and decision trajectories. This learning is also driven by new external documents, such as updated enterprise policies or regulatory guidelines.

Optimization techniques fall into two main categories:

Enhanced Context Engineering: The system continuously refines its prompts, few-shot examples, and memory-retrieved information. By optimizing context provided to the language model for each task, it increases success likelihood.

Tool Optimization and Creation: The agent's reasoning can identify capability gaps and act to fill them, involving gaining access to new tools, creating new ones on the fly, or modifying existing tools.

Conclusion

Generative AI agents mark a pivotal evolution, shifting artificial intelligence from a passive tool for content creation to an active, autonomous partner in problem-solving. This transformation requires a shift in developer paradigm—from "bricklayers" defining explicit logic to "directors" guiding, constraining, and debugging autonomous entities.

Success lies not in initial prompts alone but in engineering rigor applied to the entire system: robust tool contracts, resilient error handling, sophisticated context management, and comprehensive evaluation. The principles and architectural patterns outlined here serve as foundational blueprints for navigating this frontier, enabling creation of truly collaborative, capable, and adaptable autonomous agents that function as new members of human teams.

As this technology matures, this disciplined, architectural approach will be the deciding factor in harnessing the full power of agentic AI, transforming from workflow automation into genuine collaborative intelligence.

References

[1] Blount, A., Gulli, A., Saboo, S., Zimmermann, M., & Vuskovic, V. (2025). "Introduction to Agents and Agent architectures." Google Research. November 2025.

[2] Wei, J., Wang, X., et al. (2023). "Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models." arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.11903.

[3] Yao, S., et al. (2022). "ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models." arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.03629.

[4] Yao, S., et al. (2024). "τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains." arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.12045.

[5] Wiesinger, J., Marlow, P., et al. (2024). "Agents." Kaggle Whitepaper. Available at: https://www.kaggle.com/whitepaper-agents.

[6] Gulli, A., Nigam, L., et al. (2025). "Agents Companion." Kaggle Whitepaper. Available at: https://www.kaggle.com/whitepaper-agent-companion.

[7] Google Cloud. (2025). "Architecture: Choose a Design Pattern for Agentic AI Systems." Retrieved from https://cloud.google.com/architecture/choose-design-pattern-agentic-ai-system.

[8] Google. "Agent Development Kit (ADK) Documentation." Retrieved from https://google.github.io/adk-docs/.

[9] Kartakis, S. (2024). "GenAI in Production: MLOps or GenAIOps?" Medium. Retrieved from https://medium.com/google-cloud/genai-in-production-mlops-or-genaiops-25691c9becd0.

[10] Liu, G., & Solomon, S. (2025). "AI Agent Observability - Evolving Standards and Best Practice." OpenTelemetry Blog. Retrieved from https://opentelemetry.io/blog/2025/ai-agent-observability/.

[11] Nathani, D., et al. (2025). "MLGym: A New Framework and Benchmark for Advancing AI Research Agents." arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.14499.

[12] Gottweis, J., et al. (2025). "Accelerating scientific breakthroughs with an AI co-scientist." Google Research Blog. Retrieved from https://research.google/blog/accelerating-scientific-breakthroughs-with-an-ai-co-scientist/.